If you read I said that I didn't mean leaderboards about the aggressive side but rather sense of achievements. Skill capes mean nothing. Your a mug because that guy worked 2 hours overtime and lamped to 99". I got the lucky variant from a key". If you do not know what I mean by feeling of achievement then we're in a brick wall dude. If you want to play RS3 that is 100% completely up to you and I don't have any issue with this RuneScape gold, I however don't like the pay to acquire.
I suppose in a sense. However, the amount money is high. OSRS bossing includes a consistent potential without rares of 3-4m per hour equating to 15-20m RS3. Reaching those numbers is including those rares. So idk when osrs would be said by me is more p2w. I guess it has the capacity since the grind is more using the instances. But as much as pay for development, RS3 has it hands down due to lamps. GE prices inform the narrative OSRS is a lot more pay to acquire BiS things than RS3. OSRS gamers are willing to shell out almost 7 times the money to purchase the expensive BiS gear on the BiS gear in shows that are RS3 in OSRS it is many times harder to grind for BiS equipment themselves in OSRS.
Lamps mostly only give xp, but other than Skilling Hiscores, most RS3 progressions such as MQC, RuneScores, Clue Hiscores and Reward Systems can not be purchased with xp (and therefore bulbs ). Not sure I completely agree, to buyables with treasure hunter you can turn abilities like RC after all. A number of the promos have been ridiculously into the point where it's somewhat like a buyable skill. Though I guess this is more of an issue for people going for 200m.
Like others said it is dependent upon your definition of"win" In most other games, cover to win is referenced most often to PvP, and PvP is dead in RS3. And to most who play OSRS, max lvl is the end objective. Cover to win isn't the sole thing OSRS players dislike about RS3. A number literally feel that leveling needs to be more challenging and dull, not easier, so it'd be more"rewarding" if you reach it.
Your two examples are just irrelevant to what sport is more pay you should really be asking what game promotes pay to win more. Both example of building don't work and of what folks are referring to weapons in OSRS being more than 1 Bill makes a lot don't associate to RuneScape being pay to triumph. If you needed those weapons to progress in RuneScape, then it is pay to win but they aren't necessary at all and are a terrific goal for individuals to work towards like opting to get a 99.
It's all about if a player just depends on how educated the player is and feels like they have no choice except to buy gold. As I haven't played RS3 because EOC I can only remark on OSRS and my main comment would be that there's so much low level content that can not be progressed just by paying osrs gold paypal no id or purchasing exp lamps such as in RS3 you need to spend time doing low level quests and skills that doesn't require any high end equipment.